Post reply

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 120 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Message icon:

Type the letters shown in the picture
Listen to the letters / Request another image

Type the letters shown in the picture:
The name of this software is World Machine. What is the first (bolded) word in the name?:
New York is a major city in America. Type the initials of the city as the answer:

shortcuts: hit alt+s to submit/post or alt+p to preview

Topic Summary

Posted by: jgwinner
« on: May 09, 2016, 07:17:06 AM »

This is still a needed feature. I'm doing a lot more whole globe work lately and this is absolutely essential.

Not sure if Stephen is still around :( but figured I'd stir the pot again.

== John ==
Posted by: jgwinner
« on: August 16, 2010, 04:10:26 PM »

Sort of, yes.

It would depend on how the world (sphere) was UV mapped, but that's the essential idea.

It's not quite that simple because at high lattitudes the 'squares' aren't; they are trapezoids.  In the extreme case of one rectangle for an entire world, the line of pixes at the poles is of course just one actual pixel; it has to match on 3 sides. The next row of pixes has to match the previous row and the next, which is hard as the scale is changing as you go 'down'.

For a rectangular projection, that's why everyone things Greenland is the size of the US which is why no one uses rectangular projections in map making, but you get the idea.

== John ==
Posted by: Hepcat
« on: August 16, 2010, 04:05:18 PM »

Not exactly the same thing as you are asking, but related.  If you google earth maps you'll get rectangular projection maps ( I think that's what they are called.)  Basically they are ready to be UV mapped onto UV sphere's.  It would be awesome if WM could generate hieght maps and images in that form.  Then you could just use the hieght map to displace a shpere and UV map the image.  The trick would be having each side of the mesh and image match so they fit together smoothly.  That sound right?
Posted by: jgwinner
« on: July 09, 2010, 02:34:20 PM »

Um ... then go create your own feature request.  :P

== John ==
Posted by: smoth
« on: July 09, 2010, 02:27:51 PM »

ugh, I'd rather stephen get wm2 more stable.
Posted by: jgwinner
« on: July 08, 2010, 04:48:43 PM »

I've seen a number of people mention this, or features to give us this, so I wanted to make it a formal request  :D

Would love to be able to tile generated terrain around a sphere.

Yes, poles would be tough, but that's why we let Stephen write the software we use  :shock: :D

Another, similar feature would be to be able to map a given input device to a spherical terrain instead of rectangular - this would be necessary to take in DEM's for example, and get them to fit properly. This feature would work with the world feature to be able to break down the world into wedge shaped pieces but still export properly.

Mojo and I think Terragen do it ... so I think this is a much needed feature to stay competitive.

== John ==

P.S.  Then of course, we need a Continental Drift erosion node  :)