I know that the feature of colored macros have been requested, but I have no idea if adding ports on the bottom ports have been requested.
It would help people quickly and easily find a mask port on a macro, especially if it already has many inputs on the side.
Highly agree with this one!
Current workaround I suggest would be to add a Combiner[multiply] at the end of your macro.
This is a great idea!
It would be quite straightforward to add a checkbox to enable a mask input in the macro configuration. You’d probably be responsible for applying the mask yourself inside the macro with a combiner as HYLK mentions above, as WM doesn’t know exactly the semantics of which outputs need to be masked against which inputs, etc.
This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.